Natura 2000: „Fitness Check” of EU Nature Directives happening just now

Appropriate Assessment of Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Offers a Real Chance to Save Biodiversity

Situation in the EU

EU has set itself the aim to halt biodiversity loss in the Union by 2020. To that end, EU Habitats and Birds Directives (Nature Directives) have been adopted, under which a pan-European network of nature conservation sites, Natura 2000, was established and is protected. Unfortunately, according to the latest State of Nature report by the European Environmental Agency, biodiversity loss is still continuing at a rapid rate and progress in protection of Natura 2000 sites is modest at best. This can mostly be accounted to poor and uneven application of the EU and Habitats Directives.

J&E and Application of Nature Directives

Throughout their history, J&E and its member organizations have been using EU Nature Directives to deliver stronger arguments in defense of biodiversity. Examples, where the directives contributed to a better state of the environment and helped civil society protect biodiversity, are numerous. To name a few related to J&E work:

in Hungary, a used car battery recycling factory’s plans were scrapped as facility’s planned location was in the famous Hortobagy National Park, part of Natura 2000 network; in Estonia (Ropka) a bridge over an important site for birds was left unbuilt; etc.

During our past work, involving legal aid, case studies and assessment of national legislation, we have often relied on the „appropriate assessment“ mechanism. Simply put, this mechanism requires authorities to carefully assess impacts that proposed plans or projects may have on a Natura 2000 site and in case of danger to integrity of the site refrain from permitting the activity. J&E finds that this mechanism that „puts nature first“ carries a huge potential of actually halting the biodiversity loss in Europe.

Several challenges, however remain. Implementation of the appropriate assessment is neither uniform nor always effective. Causes for it range from lack of knowledge on the rules to lack of assessment of cumulative aspects and poor assessment of plans. To ensure better and more uniform application of appropriate assessment mechanism, J&E aims to raise various stakeholders’ knowledge on the legal requirements of appropriate assessment as well as identify and draw attention to systemic shortcomings and good practices in MS.

2014-2016: „Fitness Check“ by the European Commission

In 2014, European Commission launched a so-called „Fitness Check“ into whether the rules of EU Nature Directives are still relevant or whether they would need to be changed.

As J&E and its members have experienced that the EU Nature Directives provide direly needed additional value on the national level, we too have actively participated in this process. In the first half of 2015, we took a more detailed look into the practice of appropriate assessment. In order to provide evidence of how these rules are applied in Member States and what should be learnt from this, we carried out case studies on Hungary, Croatia and Estonia and composed a summary analysis based on them. These documents were used as part of J&E input to the Fitness Check exercise.

Together with other EU-level NGOs (e.g. EEB and Birdlife) we continue to strive for keeping the Nature Directives unchanged. J&E believes that the legal uncertainty that would follow changing the EU-wide rules would hamper their application, which has not been easy even with the Directives unchanged.

J&E closely follows what is happening with the biodiversity laws of the EU, regularly updating the public via our web page, Facebook page and Twitter account (@JustEnviNet).


Read more about Natura 2000:

Biodiversity Loss Permitted - Legal analysis

Biodiversity Loss Permitted - Position paper

Biodiversity Loss Permitted - Summary


This case was compiled for you by Siim Vahtrus, Estonia

Back to home

Related articles

Legal fight to save the Adriatic

Our member Croatian NGO Zelena akcija / FoE Croatia filed a lawsuit last week at the Rijeka Administrative Court against the Ministry for Environment and Energy’s report on the environmental impact of the floating LNG... 23.05.2018

Justice & Environment PRESS RELEASE

Complaint to the Commission lodged today as the practice of environmental assessments in member states has proven illegal 02.05.2018

Resurgent wolf is back in Belgium after more than 100 years

The wild wolf has returned for the first time in more than a century to Belgium, which has become the last country in continental Europe to report a sighting of the resurgent species. The animal, which was wearing an... 05.02.2018

Commission pressured over conservation shortcomings

The EU will fail to halt biodiversity loss unless Brussels steps up its response and proposes concrete policies to plug financing gaps, according to MEPs and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC). Oral... 05.09.2017

It is getting more difficult to work with Poland

Polish officials have dismissed as “politically motivated” an injunction from the EU court ordering an immediate halt to logging activity in the Białowieża forest pending the outcome of a court case. The EU Court of... 21.08.2017

Breaking: The Court of Justice of the EU has issued a ban on logging in Białowieża Forest

The Court of Justice of the EU has issued a ban on logging in Białowieża Forest, saying all chainsaws and harvesters must be stopped immediately. The ruling shows that, in the Court’s opinion, increased timber harvesting in... 28.07.2017

UNESCO urges Poland to stop logging ancient forest

UNESCO on 5 July “strongly” urged Poland to stop logging the older parts of the ancient Białowieża forest, a world heritage site that includes some of Europe’s last primeval woodland. 10.07.2017